<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News 3 Show and News3insider.com Scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electronplumber.com/news-3-show-and-news3insider-com-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electronplumber.com/news-3-show-and-news3insider-com-scam/</link>
	<description>No Bullsh*t Advice For Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark B</title>
		<link>http://electronplumber.com/news-3-show-and-news3insider-com-scam/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronplumber.com/?p=962#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>I wonder how various countries regulate scam hosting handling. In the case of the news3insider.com their hosting co is:  

role:           BlueConnex Ltd Operators
address:        BlueConnex Ltd
address:        BlueSquare House
address:        Priors Way
address:        Maidenhead
address:        Berkshire
address:        SL62HP
remarks:        For abuse please contact abuse@blueconnex.net
phone:          +44 (0)1628 673131

In this case, the UK-based blueconnex.net, as in many other much more severe international cases, such as China and others, who act bluntly as the under-regulated semi-criminal enterprises, the entire responsibility is typically limited to providing  an abuse@ email contact. A more important question still remains: what is actual local (to the host) legal regulation managing the handling of the received abuse@ emails. As I experienced myself with GoDaddy, their typical answer is &quot;we are not a law enforcement nor censoring organization&quot; and do absolutely nothing. It&#039;s obvious  then that the hosting companies, in search of their unlimited shady revenues, are not effective nor interested in investigating and enforcing anything that may be limiting their own revenues.  All that looks like a typical recent scenario: we have substantial technical means to regulate greed but absolutely no regulatory will to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how various countries regulate scam hosting handling. In the case of the news3insider.com their hosting co is:  </p>
<p>role:           BlueConnex Ltd Operators<br />
address:        BlueConnex Ltd<br />
address:        BlueSquare House<br />
address:        Priors Way<br />
address:        Maidenhead<br />
address:        Berkshire<br />
address:        SL62HP<br />
remarks:        For abuse please contact <a href="mailto:abuse@blueconnex.net">abuse@blueconnex.net</a><br />
phone:          +44 (0)1628 673131</p>
<p>In this case, the UK-based blueconnex.net, as in many other much more severe international cases, such as China and others, who act bluntly as the under-regulated semi-criminal enterprises, the entire responsibility is typically limited to providing  an abuse@ email contact. A more important question still remains: what is actual local (to the host) legal regulation managing the handling of the received abuse@ emails. As I experienced myself with GoDaddy, their typical answer is &#8220;we are not a law enforcement nor censoring organization&#8221; and do absolutely nothing. It&#8217;s obvious  then that the hosting companies, in search of their unlimited shady revenues, are not effective nor interested in investigating and enforcing anything that may be limiting their own revenues.  All that looks like a typical recent scenario: we have substantial technical means to regulate greed but absolutely no regulatory will to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->