<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 6/7 Update Of The Great Link Building Service Experiment Of 2011 &#8211; The Return Of Unique Article Wizard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electronplumber.com/week-67-update-of-the-great-link-building-service-experiment-of-2011-the-return-of-unique-article-wizard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electronplumber.com/week-67-update-of-the-great-link-building-service-experiment-of-2011-the-return-of-unique-article-wizard/</link>
	<description>No Bullsh*t Advice For Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armaan</title>
		<link>http://electronplumber.com/week-67-update-of-the-great-link-building-service-experiment-of-2011-the-return-of-unique-article-wizard/#comment-6572</link>
		<dc:creator>Armaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronplumber.com/?p=1620#comment-6572</guid>
		<description>Hey EP,

Thanks for that clarification...A lot of the &quot;IM gurus&quot; say that too many links pointing to your main site are harmful but I don&#039;t think that Big G will ever penalize a site for &quot;having too many links&quot;. If that were so, I could easily point an army of links to take down my competitors! What are your thoughts on the same?

Also, I have a niche site that just keeps disappearing and then appearing in the SERPS...it&#039;s been happening for over a year now and I have no clue...this site had UAW links pointing to it but I think the issue lies in &quot;overusing&quot; the anchor text....I think I need more of &quot;Click Here&quot; type of anchor text...any help on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey EP,</p>
<p>Thanks for that clarification&#8230;A lot of the &#8220;IM gurus&#8221; say that too many links pointing to your main site are harmful but I don&#8217;t think that Big G will ever penalize a site for &#8220;having too many links&#8221;. If that were so, I could easily point an army of links to take down my competitors! What are your thoughts on the same?</p>
<p>Also, I have a niche site that just keeps disappearing and then appearing in the SERPS&#8230;it&#8217;s been happening for over a year now and I have no clue&#8230;this site had UAW links pointing to it but I think the issue lies in &#8220;overusing&#8221; the anchor text&#8230;.I think I need more of &#8220;Click Here&#8221; type of anchor text&#8230;any help on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Plumber (admin)</title>
		<link>http://electronplumber.com/week-67-update-of-the-great-link-building-service-experiment-of-2011-the-return-of-unique-article-wizard/#comment-6241</link>
		<dc:creator>El Plumber (admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronplumber.com/?p=1620#comment-6241</guid>
		<description>Armaan, I&#039;m not a big fan of linking to Web 2.0 properties that you have little control over in the long run.  I pointed directly to my main sites in this experiment and other than a couple stints in the sandbox due to keyword stuffing, everything seems to be fine.  If you are wary of pointing directly to your main site, ideally you would setup your own content network of sites and point BMR and UAW links at them, then those pointing to your main sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Armaan, I&#8217;m not a big fan of linking to Web 2.0 properties that you have little control over in the long run.  I pointed directly to my main sites in this experiment and other than a couple stints in the sandbox due to keyword stuffing, everything seems to be fine.  If you are wary of pointing directly to your main site, ideally you would setup your own content network of sites and point BMR and UAW links at them, then those pointing to your main sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armaan</title>
		<link>http://electronplumber.com/week-67-update-of-the-great-link-building-service-experiment-of-2011-the-return-of-unique-article-wizard/#comment-6232</link>
		<dc:creator>Armaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronplumber.com/?p=1620#comment-6232</guid>
		<description>Hi EP,

Firstly kudos for doing such a detailed job and explaining your experiment so thoroughly? One basic question I have is....

Should we point all the BMR and UAW links directly to our main site or should we point out UAW/BMR links to major Web 2.0 properties (EZA,Squidoo,Blogger etc) and have those properties link to our main site?

Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi EP,</p>
<p>Firstly kudos for doing such a detailed job and explaining your experiment so thoroughly? One basic question I have is&#8230;.</p>
<p>Should we point all the BMR and UAW links directly to our main site or should we point out UAW/BMR links to major Web 2.0 properties (EZA,Squidoo,Blogger etc) and have those properties link to our main site?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://electronplumber.com/week-67-update-of-the-great-link-building-service-experiment-of-2011-the-return-of-unique-article-wizard/#comment-2911</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronplumber.com/?p=1620#comment-2911</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m testing article ranks myself (it&#039;s cheap and cheerful). V interested in your link Aloha results. Clearly you don&#039;t need to spend a lot of money to get results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m testing article ranks myself (it&#8217;s cheap and cheerful). V interested in your link Aloha results. Clearly you don&#8217;t need to spend a lot of money to get results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delfin Joaquin Paris III</title>
		<link>http://electronplumber.com/week-67-update-of-the-great-link-building-service-experiment-of-2011-the-return-of-unique-article-wizard/#comment-2904</link>
		<dc:creator>Delfin Joaquin Paris III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronplumber.com/?p=1620#comment-2904</guid>
		<description>Great job on the experiment.  Looks like good profile links plus BMR is a quality combo.

The only other thing I&#039;d add in a future experiment is...

Does using an indexing service on profile links help your rank?

I&#039;m doing this right now, but I don&#039;t have a control group to test against.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job on the experiment.  Looks like good profile links plus BMR is a quality combo.</p>
<p>The only other thing I&#8217;d add in a future experiment is&#8230;</p>
<p>Does using an indexing service on profile links help your rank?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing this right now, but I don&#8217;t have a control group to test against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->